Category Archives: Retirement

Super Agers

AARP Bulletin cover with large diagonal text reading "Super Agers" on blue background

Reading the November issue of the AARP Bulletin about “super agers,” people who seem to defy the common complications of aging and appear destined to live a very long life, I recalled a recent conversation with a friend I’ve known since high school. We laughed as we talked about some of the experiences we’re having as people of a certain age and generation.

We laughed and made jokes about not wanting to live as long as science predicts that super agers might live. We agreed that the most unthinkable downside of living a long life would be outliving loved ones younger than us.  

Another major downside of living a long life is the specter of becoming a living, breathing, walking ghost in our own time. Having experienced the loss of friends our age, we find ourselves in communities where we have fewer and fewer peers and no matter where we are, we think we are the oldest in the room.

As we have always done, we looked for the humor in our situation. We decided that we were living ghosts because younger people don’t really see us. They know that we’re here as a presence but not really an entity with whom they should engage. They feel our ghostly presence but not as contributors to the life they’re living.

We don’t blame them for not engaging with us. We understand that they don’t seek conversations with us because they “know” that we probably can’t connect with what they’re talking about regarding their social media interests, music they’re listening to, movies that appeal to them, and the fashions that are most fun and attractive to them. They see us as old-fashioned as we saw our elders when we were young.

We laughed as we shared anecdotes that supported our understanding that we were living, breathing, walking ghosts.

I told her about an experience I had some time ago when I was thrilled to be with a young friend at a club enjoying music and conversation while people-watching. A couple of seats at our table were empty. After some time, a young couple took the seats. After a while they asked “us” if “we” had heard this music group before.

That was the opening to talk about other things that “they” had in common. I care about my young friend, so I was not upset. I was just observant. The three of them engaged in animated conversation throughout the evening, never seeming to notice that I was a living, breathing human sitting with them at this very small table.

 I couldn’t believe how unaware they were that I was excluded from the conversation. I don’t think ignoring me was out of malice or even bad manners. It was just how things are.

Thankfully, the situation at the club was the most blatant demonstration of exclusion and being treated as a void that I have had. 

My long-time friend and I concluded that we ought to keep these rare instances in perspective and not allow the behavioral inclinations of the young to influence our worth and self-esteem. As we reminded ourselves, we have always swum against the tide and don’t plan to stop swimming any time soon.

Sensitivity

The sun is bright in a perfectly blue sky and the water aerobics class is in full swing. There are so many of us in the pool that we must keep checking to make sure we don’t kick someone. We all love this class with the music classics that give us the beat to help us move our bodies as if we’re young again.

Most of us just follow the instructor and try to keep up. I’m sure I’m not the only one who loves to hear the loud whoops and comments from one zany, fun-loving woman who makes an early morning class feel like an afternoon fiesta. She sometimes repeats what the instructor directs us to do as if she’s a microphone and sometimes she makes comments about what we love and what we dread doing as an exercise. She makes it fun and not work.

There must have been something in the air on this particular morning because a woman near me who seemed to enjoy the cheerleader on previous occasions said to me that she wished someone had tape for the mouth of our cheerleader. A short time later, another woman approached our cheerleader and said something to her about keeping it down. Then there was silence and it felt strange to be in the water going through our routines without our cheerleader.

Not long after the forced silence except for the music and instructions for the exercises, our zany cheerleader, apparently feeling admonished, made her way to the back of the pool. As she passed me, she said, “Some people don’t like the noise I make.” I said, “I love the noise you make!”

After she found a spot in the very back of the pool, I beckoned her to come back to her spot. She shook her head, no. The instructor who, like many of us enjoyed her cheerleading, asked her if she was all right. She nodded that she was. When I checked a few minutes later, she had left the pool.

I watched as a few people rallied around the woman who admonished the cheerleader, and I could see that she was explaining how minimal her comment was.

I felt sad for both women. As tough as women may be in making their bodies strong, as aggressive as they might be in their careers, and as in charge as they may be in their own household, there are not many who can allow what is considered a slight or admonishment to roll off like water.

Often onlookers of our shame and our reaction to feeling diminished will say that we’re “too sensitive.” Perhaps those of us deemed “too sensitive” are resigned to care too much about the connections between ourselves and others. For those who navigate the world immune to slights and prejudices, one wonders what the impact of this posture might have on their ability to empathize with those who are not immune to the judgments of others.

Rather than feel embarrassed about being described as too sensitive, one might feel sad for those who are not sensitive enough.

A Recipe Box Down Memory Lane

close-up of recipe box with handwritten index cards and alphabet dividers

Every time I open the door to the cabinet, I see—on top of a few Martha Stewart cookbooks that my husband liked—the little gray plastic box with the alphabet tabs for recipe index cards. The box was so stuffed that the lid never closed.  When I hesitate a moment before getting what I opened the cabinet for, I tell myself that I really need to take time to go through those old recipes and get rid of those I know I’ll never use again.

The day finally came for me to weed the box of some tattered and yellowed index cards. What a trip down memory lane of good times and good people.

I was surprised at the number of recipes to which I attributed an “owner’s” name. Weeks after clearing out most of the recipes, I wish I had written down the names of the people I owe for the recipes.

Some that I remember include Grace’s Gooey Butter Cake and Potato Salad, Ginny’s Lettuce Bacon Salad, Bob’s Chicken Curry Casserole, Bettie’s Cornbread Dressing, Maw’s Pecan Crescents, Anne’s Marinara Sauce, Jacki’s Gravy, Jackie’s Mac & Cheese, Mary’s Broccoli Cheese Bake, Larry’s Squash Rolls, and Aunt Evelyn’s Fried Corn. And then there’s “What’s Her Face,” who gave me the recipe for the Texas Chocolate Cake. I didn’t have her name attached but I remember her clearly…except for her name, that is.

Each of these recipes found its way into my box because I had enjoyed the dishes made by the recipe-giver and wanted more. I thought I could replicate the dishes and make them for my family. I can say with all candor that my attempts at the dishes were never as tasty as the originals, but they were good enough for me to keep trying.

The best part of attempting these dishes was that the process always brought back memories of the people who unselfishly shared their recipes with me.

Images in My Mind’s Eye

Retired friends were talking about things they left at their previous homes and wished they had kept. After the conversation, I began to take a mental tour of the house I left in Maryland when I moved to Arizona. As my imagination took me from room to room, I recalled the fun adventures Charles and I had as we shopped for and selected everything.

Reminiscing as I visualized each room and space, I have no regrets about leaving almost everything we owned behind. We enjoyed them for years and I am grateful for that. There are, however, two exceptions to my laissez-faire attitude about what I left behind.   

While I could not have kept these two items because of my current space, I would like to be able to look at them every now and then.

Both of these prized items were in a room seldom entered unless there was a special occasion. We made what had been a game room into our living room, despite its being in the very back of the house. 

In place of the game room’s pool table, our living room featured a large, square, black lacquer coffee table with fat rounded legs making it appear as if crouching low to the floor. That table owned the space it covered. It could not be dismissed.

A particular photo comes to mind of a friend sitting on the floor next to the table while celebrating Christmas with us. Despite a riot of wrapping paper strewn across the table and the loveliness of the smiling friend, that table still took center stage, quiet and magisterial.  

In that same room was what I considered the most beautiful object in the house. I don’t recall how our search started, but we were on the hunt for Quezal iridescent glass in the art nouveau style for our central light fixture to replace the previous track lighting.

We searched antique shops and contemporary shops for just the right lighting for this special room. We recognized it instantly. it was like looking at our newborn among a nursery of beautiful babies. Everything else paled in comparison.

As it turned out, it was not what we thought we were searching for. I’m unable to give a fair description of this chandelier that looked like nothing we had ever seen. There was no sparkling glass. There was no lightness about it. It was as heavy as it looked. We feared that the beautiful antique brass base needed to attach it to the sloping ceiling would not be able to support it.

Not to everyone’s taste, it had a huge bowl shape with golden brass fittings. The color of the bowl was the peach of an early Arizona evening sunset with subtle granite-like veins sparsely trailing throughout.  It was gorgeous without the light being on and awestriking when lit. When we first got it, we would walk into the room together, look up at it, and then look at each other and smile with great satisfaction.

Mr. Fantastic

Laurence N Smith

Once in a lifetime, if you’re lucky, you will know a Mr. or Ms. FANTASTIC!

Laurence N. Smith is my Mr. Fantastic! He was the vice president for University Marketing and Student Affairs at Eastern Michigan University from 1975–2000.

I give him this title because he stands out from the rest in every way. He’s always the tallest in the room and the smartest in the room. And when asked how he’s doing, invariably, he responds, “FAANTASTIC!”

Leadership in a volunteer organization based in higher education can be a different experience than what a leader might be able to do in a top-down organization where the people responsible for making the trains run on time are paid and can be released at-will.

When I was in such a leadership position, willing volunteers were the key to success. Many stepped forward to let me know that I could count on them to help me achieve the goals of the organization. They used words like “help you,” “support you,” “here when you need me.”

In my imaginative recall, Larry Smith, towering over the heads of his colleagues, fixed his eyes on me, made a beeline to me, and asked, “What is your vision for this organization?” With confidence, I summarized my mandate from the volunteer board of directors and added my own vision, which could be described as fantastical given the structure and history of the organization. Mr. Fantastic’s eyes communicated, “Are you sure?” The gaze I returned indicated that I was.

Lyrics from songs best describe his response: “Come along with me,” “I’ll take you there,” “I believe I can fly!” My leadership vision was the perfect vehicle for Mr. Fantastic to test drive his ideas about what student affairs administration in higher education could “truly be.”

On the journey with Mr. Fantastic, it was obvious that when we were talking about using listservs to bring our members together in conversation from various locations, he was already thinking about what we now call Zoom meetings. When we were talking about Palm Pilots, he was envisioning what is now Chat GPT. Always looking toward the possibilities for the future, never fearing failure, and always optimistic is my Mr. Fantastic.

And I’m not the only one that found Larry to be fantastic. In 1999, he was named a NASPA Pillar of the Profession, and in 2002, he was the recipient of the Fred Turner Award for Outstanding Service to NASPA. The equivalent of a Lifetime Achievement Award, the Turner Award recognizes NASPA members who have brought honor and dignity to the student affairs profession and to NASPA as an association for a sustained period. Among Larry’s extensive activities, he was founder and chair of the NASPA National Academy for Leadership and Executive Effectiveness and executive editor of NASPA’s online management magazine.

I spoke with Larry recently and told him that to have him as a colleague and friend during my time at NASPA was a blessing of pain and glory. The pain was tempering the projections of where the organization could go and modulating the speed of change in order to be in sync with the volunteer leadership. The glory was the innovations NASPA achieved through its volunteers when we were flying with Mr. FAANTASTIC!

Thank you, Larry. I am truly grateful for your colleagueship and friendship.

A Philosophy of Sorts

Guest blog by David Keymer

Over time I arrived at something like a philosophy to govern my work in student affairs and higher education. Ultimately, all of our expertise points back to a vision of what college and university life should be like, what it should do. Universities and colleges are a special kind of community—a community of learners. The emphasis should be on both words: “community” and “learners.”

The ideas, then, are simple…nothing complicated:

First and foremost, I was there for the students, and the students were there to get an education. In this exchange, then, it was the students who were paramount. If it was about empowering students, it was simply a matter of service for me. That meant that…

  • students should always be able to reach me;
  • it was important that I give good value in whatever I did; and
  • ego was less important than results.

Using power gratuitously is not only wrong, it’s counterproductive. The power I held was the position’s and there for a purpose. It was not mine and, just because I had it by way of the position did not mean I had to use it.

This was especially true as I realized that everyone on campus needed to be in the same business of helping students succeed, academically as well as socially. Parents or prospective students didn’t come on campus and ask where the Vice President for Student Affairs’ office was. They talked to whomever they met. It might be a worker planting flowers in the flower beds outside a classroom building, or a campus police officer passing by, or a stray faculty member or student on the way to class. As a result, I did a lot of walking around talking to colleagues and students to ensure we got our message out that we had the same ends and were serious and proud of our commitment to student success.

Everything I managed to do required other people. It was important, then, that I listen to EVERYone, not take others for granted, and recognize others’ contributions and let them know I appreciated them. That being said, an important piece of effectively working with people is to cooperate, but “never give up your teeth.” The work is too important, and every so often, you may have to take a bite out of someone to convince the other person you’re not kidding.

Relatedly, developing people is as important as spurring them on to work well. It takes time, money, and effort to find and hire someone new for a position. If there were difficulties initially, it wasn’t a matter of giving up, but needing to find out what people did well and what inspired them, then leveraging those strengths and interests.

After all, work should be fun as well as work.


David Keymer served as a chief student affairs officer at SUNY Utica Rome; California State University, Stanislaus; and Zayed University (Dubai and Abu Dhabi) from 1983-2004. For more wisdom gleaned from Keymer’s experience in student affairs across these varied institutions, check out the seven-part series published in 2021 from a set of interviews.

Ultimate (and Unanswerable?) Questions

white outlined questions marks on dark blue background

In the introduction to her Selected Poems, former Poet Laureate Rita Dove posed the following “ultimate—and ultimately unanswerable—questions” regarding the “mystery of what destiny boils down to”:

  • How does where I come from determine where I’ve ended up?
  • Why am I what I am and not what I thought I’d be?
  • What did I think I’d be?
  • Where do I reside most completely?

It is at this stage of life that I have time to search for answers to these heretofore unanswerable questions and to begin the task of solving the mystery of my own destiny. I invite you to take the journey with me.

Let Go

A few years ago, I moved into a smaller space, and I had to make judgments about what of my accumulations from over the years to keep and what to let go. Recently, I looked for a favorite fall jacket and when I couldn’t find it, I realized that it didn’t make the cut when I decided what to let go.

During the process of downsizing, I was faced with decisions about clothes, furnishings, and tchotchkes. I also had a huge store of files with articles and papers that I had accumulated over a 50-year career. Two large storage cabinets and five upright file cabinets were full of what I thought were important pieces of information that I might want to reference at some time in the future. At the time that I stored these items, I thought that they were too important to let go.

The files were alphabetized, from the first file cabinet on the left to the fifth cabinet on the far right. When I would pull out the top drawer of the first file cabinet, the first quarter of the drawer held folders that were all labelled affirmative action. The folders held articles that I had written about affirmative action starting in graduate school, as well as many articles written by others that I collected over the years.

Recently, when I heard news about arguments on affirmative action at the Supreme Court, I was prompted to go to my new downsized file cabinets to review some of the papers and articles on affirmative action.

I was stunned to find that I had let go of every single folder labelled affirmative action! In fact, it was a surprise to me that in the top drawer of my new alphabetized first file cabinet there were no folders containing topics beginning with A, B, or C. With the first folders now beginning with the letter “D,” I found “diversity” folders in the place “affirmative action” folders had once been.

This single word—diversity—and its many connotations has been the single thread and lifeline to maintain the spirit of affirmative action, particularly, in selective colleges and universities. In making the argument for the value of diversity for all students, colleges and universities had to let go of race as a prominent qualification in admissions considerations.

With the anticipated decision of the Supreme Court on affirmative action, I want to believe that there is no entity more capable of finding a way to keep the original intent of affirmative action/diversity alive than higher education. To let go of diversity—not only as a compelling interest for all students, but also as a way to ensure that Black students, faculty, and staff are well-represented participants throughout higher education—has huge current and future ramifications for the whole of U.S. society.

Notwithstanding the probable decision of the Supreme Court, let’s hope that colleges and universities will not let go of the spirit of affirmative action/diversity with the construct of race at its center.

Some thoughts on drawing and painting

Guest post by Dee Jenkins

I think drawing and painting demand a certain kind of faith, a willingness to believe that bearing with the processes involved will eventually lead to a worthwhile outcome. If I didn’t hold that view, I don’t think I could tolerate the inevitable frustrations and disappointments that occur along the way.

When I work, I repeat a sequence of actions over and over again on the same surface. There are two phases in the sequence; one is analytical and intellectual, and the other is driven by interior sensations and needs. I used to think the phases were in conflict with each other in a negative way, but I have come to see the conflict as positive and critical even, because the tension it creates can eventually lead to a surprising and gratifying resolution well worth the time and effort involved.

Such a process, however, demands an endless evaluation and re-evaluation of pictorial elements, including the elements of a picture’s dimensions and edges. It was Giacometti who gave me permission to think of them this way, despite the fact that in most of my art classes I had been instructed to take the dimensions one starts out with as a given. Watching a dog “make its bed” also gave me permission, since before deciding on the right space in which to settle in and settle down, a dog will thoroughly investigate an area; go here, go there, circle around, dig things up, pat things down, etc., just as I like to do (sort of) before I can settle in and settle down within a pictorial space that feels comfortable.

Jazz, Latin, and Tango have all enriched my visual education, as have art and artists from both past and present. Best case scenario: there is music in what I do, and a rhythmic connection between the parts and the whole of every picture. It is frequently the “mistakes” I make as I work that lead me in the most unexpected and exciting directions, and any idea I start out with has by the end, been transformed into something very different from my initial intention. The process of creating an image is ultimately a mystery, and it may be one that is better left unsolved.


Dee Jenkins is a painter, and retired professor, County College of Morris, New Jersey.

The Excitement and Curiosity of Having “No Plans”

Retirement is one of those events that some look forward to with eager anticipation while others feel sad about the prospect.  Then there are some—like me—who don’t experience either of these thoughts or emotions.

On February 22, 2012, about a month before I officially retired from NASPA, I wrote the following in my journal:

As I get nearer to the final days at NASPA, I feel no sadness. I feel satisfaction and pray that all continues to prosper with the organization.

On March 1, 2012, I wrote:

I don’t think I’m going to miss my role. I just want to keep doing something that is meaningful to move our world forward. I want to add my part, fulfill my purpose, live up to my potential.

These were goals for my life. I had no plans for what I would do in retirement.  

Being without the responsibility of a job and having no reason to get up, to get dressed, and to leave the house would be a little like a free fall. I had to rely on my faith that without these routines and trappings of identity, I would still be able to maintain confidence in myself and optimism about my future.

As I dropped through the space of what could be a professional void, unexpected safety nets and lifelines afforded me a soft landing in the field of retirement after my last day as NASPA Executive Director on March 30, 2012. At the same time as I was consulting, facilitating workshops, and making speeches (see boxed list), I was working on writing projects with 2012 deadlines and organizing and filing a career’s worth of papers and notes at home.

What gave me the energy to follow through on the activities and experiences I had during the year that I “retired” was my excitement and curiosity about the experiment of having “no plans.”

Since this experiment, I’ve stopped making New Year’s resolutions and I’ve begun each year with optimism and “no plans.”

  • 4/15-16: Indiana State University
  • 4/18: Skype with master’s class, DePaul University
  • 4/25: in person with graduate class, University of Maryland, College Park
  • 5/21-29: China on behalf of NASPA
  • 6/4: Taylor University in Indiana
  • 6/19-23: Portland State University
  • 7/9: conference, Los Angeles
  • 7/28: conference, Manhattan
  • 7/30-8/3: University of Vermont
  • 8/16: University of Southern California
  • 8/30-9/1: Evergreen State University
  • 9/17-19: California State University, Fullerton
  • 9/18: Skype with graduate students, Colorado State University
  • 9/19-21: conference, Washington, DC
  • 9/30: Skype with graduate students, Oregon State University
  • 10/16-17: Berkeley College, New York City
  • 10/19: conference, Baltimore
  • 11/1-2: Wake Forest University
  • 11/18-19: conference, Hawaii